Evidence-led engagement. Engineered for precision.
AEOS builds specialized analytical engines, verification infrastructure, autonomous workflows, and cryptographic evidence systems for complex financial populations and critical protocol invariants. Every engagement operates within explicit population boundaries and documented evidentiary limitations—delivering independently verifiable analytical outcomes.
Canonical Population vs. Historical Research Benchmark
National Ledger Census (Category A)
Audited historical research corpus underlying the 2026 institutional white paper.
Operational Public Ledger Population
Live production database supporting active fiduciary audits and recovery analytics.
⚠ 159 distinct authority codes observed across records. Verified authority count is held pending external multi-source namespace reconciliation (TF 2 kap. / SCB).
⚠ Operational monetary sum is strictly suppressed pending upstream parser offset normalization to prevent misleading aggregates.
AEOS Recovery Intelligence
Exhaustive accounts payable forensic review and procurement leakage identification for public authorities and enterprises.
A structured, project-based analytical engagement that evaluates complete historical transaction populations to identify uncredited rebates, duplicate disbursements, VAT misallocations, and framework agreement deviations. Every finding is anchored to source voucher records and formatted into rigorous recovery dossiers for executive review.
Scoped Population Census
Evaluates 100% of the ingested transaction population within agreed boundaries, eliminating sampling blind spots across submitted ledgers.
Source-Linked Findings
Every potential overpayment is linked directly to voucher ID, booking date, bankgiro, and invoice line.
Statutory Civil Restitution
Computes recoverable amounts under condictio indebiti with statutory interest calculated under applicable laws.
Cryptographic Merkle Proofs
Evidence packages sealed with RFC 6962 binary Merkle trees, verifiable offline in any browser.
Concrete Project Deliverables
- ✔ Dataset & Scope Assessment Document defining data boundaries
- ✔ Itemized anomaly register with exact voucher IDs and timestamps
- ✔ Statutory interest schedules calculated under applicable civil codes
- ✔ Exception and uncertainty register itemizing unverified entries
- ✔ Final executive recovery dossier with draft recovery claims
Commercial Terms & Client Governance
Engagements are structured as bounded pilot projects. Available under fixed scoping fees or a potential performance-aligned model (No Cure, No Pay, subject to formal agreement, procurement rules, and applicable law). The client retains sole executive authority over whether to enforce any recovery.
Complete 15-Domain Practice Portfolio
AEOS operates a structured portfolio of 15 analytical verification domains spanning public finance, procurement intelligence, counterparty risk, and cryptographic assurance. Each domain maintains an honest delivery-readiness classification based on actual evidence.
AP Liquidity Recovery
For: Municipalities, Regions & Corporate GroupsComprehensive reconciliation of accounts payable ledgers. Identifies duplicate disbursements, unapplied credit notes, and booking collisions under strict civil restitution doctrines (condictio indebiti).
Municipal Statutory Audit Support
For: Elected Municipal Auditors & Audit CommitteesIndependent expert working papers for elected municipal and regional auditors. Full-population ledger testing against municipal approval regulations and attest requirements.
LOU Spend Auditing
For: Procurement Directors & Public ControllersAutomated detection of off-contract purchasing and direct procurement threshold breaches under the Public Procurement Act (LOU), cross-referenced against TED notices.
Energy Tax Recovery
For: Manufacturing & Heavy IndustryHistorical energy and excise taxation review under LSE 11:9. Gated from active commercial offering while calculation models and evidence dependencies undergo external validation.
Procurement Market Intelligence
For: B2G Enterprise Bidders & ContractorsEmpirical decision dossiers for enterprises bidding in public tenders. Synthesizes verified multi-year purchasing volumes and disbursements across 290 municipalities and 21 regions.
DORA/NIS2 Contract Reviews
For: Financial Entities & Critical Infrastructure BoardsIndependent technical review working papers assessing key ICT third-party contractual terms under DORA Art 30. Provides objective analytical documentation (not legal advice).
Legal Recovery Support
For: Legal Counsels & Municipal AttorneysStructured civil restitution claim dossiers under condictio indebiti principles and statutory interest schedules calculated under Räntelagen (1975:635) § 6.
Cryptographic Merkle & CAS
For: Compliance Officers & Forensic EvaluatorsRFC 6962 binary Merkle tree root anchoring and content-addressable storage. Guarantees bit-exact byte tamper-detection and independent offline browser verification.
DeFi Formal Invariant Auditing
For: Web3 Protocols, DAOs & Security CouncilsFormal verification of smart-contract state machines and economic invariants in EVM environments. Mathematical proofs of non-exploitability for core liquidity pools.
SP1 zkVM Proof Demonstrations
For: Fintechs & Digital Asset CustodiansDemonstration of zero-knowledge computational integrity for defined balance invariants using Succinct SP1 RISC-V zkVM. Proves reserve backing without revealing transaction records.
Supplier F-Tax & Debt Screening
For: Enterprise Procurement & Construction CPOsAutomated public registry verification of vendor F-tax status, tax account restföringar, and insolvency filings. Strictly restricted to Aktiebolag (AB) under GDPR.
Independent-School Equal-Treatment Analysis
For: Independent School Operators & Governing BoardsAnalytical reconciliation of municipal pupil voucher allocations (skolpeng grundbelopp) against actual municipal accounting expenditures under the Education Act.
Corporate Parentage & UBO
For: Due Diligence Teams & Integrity InvestigatorsGraph network analysis tracing ultimate beneficial ownership (UBO) and corporate group structures from official registries to identify conflicts of interest in tenders.
Inter-Municipal Price Parity
For: Municipal Procurement Officers & ControllersMacro-level benchmarking comparing unit purchasing prices across neighboring authorities for standardized commodity codes to identify price dispersion.
Pan-Nordic Procurement Feeds
For: Data Science Teams & B2G Market AnalystsStandardized columnar data feeds harmonizing public procurement award notices across Sweden, Norway, and Finland into structured Parquet and CSV schemas.
Full-Population Testing and Sampling Risk: Complementary Audit Evidence
Statistical sampling and full-population testing provide complementary forms of audit evidence. When a complete and reconciled population is available, a correctly specified deterministic control can be evaluated across every record—eliminating sampling risk for that specific test within the defined population boundary.
Coverage Profile: Statistical Sample vs Full-Population Testing
The grid below models an annual ledger flow of 100,000 transactions across 500 audit blocks. Toggle the models below to evaluate audit coverage and sampling risk.
Audit Methodology: Statistical Sampling vs Deterministic Full-Population Testing
Methodology: 100% Comprehensive Census • Formal Invariant Testing
| Evaluation Parameter | Statistical Sampling (Traditional Practice) | Deterministic Full-Population Testing (AEOS) | Fiduciary & Methodological Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transaction Scope | Statistical sample of transaction population | 100.00% exhaustive census (71.07M rows in Cat A) | Eliminates sampling risk for automated deterministic test rules across full dataset. |
| Fee Alignment Model | Standard billable hours model regardless of recovery outcome | Performance-aligned model (subject to contract and applicable law) | Fees billed exclusively as an agreed share of verified, actually recovered funds. |
| Data Sovereignty & Privacy | External data hosting or cloud-based spreadsheet exchange | Isolated local runtime (0 Bytes network egress perimeter) | Raw data processed locally on dedicated offline workstations with zero cloud AI API dependencies. |
| Processing Throughput | Multi-week manual voucher retrieval and inspection cycles | Vectorized columnar execution across complete transaction corpus | Rapid deterministic collision detection across millions of records. |
| Evidentiary Provenance | Traditional audit memoranda and sample test summaries | Execution manifests sealed with SHA-256 and Merkle anchors | Cryptographically anchored evidence ledger supporting professional and legal review. |
The 5-Level Assurance Hierarchy: Separating Evidence from Professional Judgment
AEOS establishes an explicit boundary between computational proof and professional audit evaluation. Algorithmic determinism provides rigorous Level 1–4 technical evidence, serving as an unassailable foundation for human Level 5 fiduciary decision-making.
Processing Coverage
100% of records in the acquired dataset are evaluated against the formal invariant (N=100%).
Population Reconciliation
Acquired data (D_a) is formally reconciled against published financial statements and source control totals (D_s).
Computational Determinism
Identical inputs, code, and environment reproduce identical canonical results (X_1 = X_2 ⇒ F(X_1) = F(X_2)).
Independent Verification
Independent parties verify Merkle root anchors, execution traces, and optional zero-knowledge proofs.
Professional Evaluation
Qualified auditors, CFOs, or legal counsel assess primary evidence, counterparty defences, and legal merits.
Independent Fiduciary Oversight Grounded in Mathematical Determinism
AEOS (Fiduciary Systems & Economic Oversight) was established by Emil Jansson to provide independent computational assurance, formal verification, and forensic ledger analytics. We deliver transparent, reproducible evidence models that support professional auditors, municipal committees, and executive boards.
AEOS reports processing 71,073,875 invoice line items, representing SEK 15.41 trillion in gross invoiced value, within a benchmark corpus covering 78 public authorities. These figures describe the stated invoice dataset; they do not, by themselves, establish complete coverage of all Swedish public authorities, settlement of every invoice, or recovery of any amount of cash. Population completeness, source reconciliation and payment verification are separate assurance objectives and are documented independently where performed.
Emil Jansson
AEOS operates as an independent factual auditing and analytical body for boards, audit committees, funds, and executive leadership. Liability, limitations and other engagement terms are defined in the written agreement and remain subject to applicable law.
Independent Cryptographic Proof Verification
Validate audit working papers and ledger integrity directly in your browser. Every SHA-256 digest and proof structure is computed client-side with zero server dependency.
Cryptographic Certificate NOT YET VERIFIED
Hermetic Isolation & Regulatory Integrity
Our analytical execution runtime operates as an isolated execution environment designed for high confidentiality, DORA operational resilience support, and independent mathematical verifiability. Zero client data or business records leave the local runtime.
Cryptographic Integrity
All audit working papers and evidence chains are cryptographically sealed with immutable Merkle anchors and SHA-256 digests.
0 Bytes Egress & Zero Cloud AI
Local Processing Isolation: Zero client ledger data or confidential records are ever uploaded to cloud relays or external AI models.
Deterministic Population Census
Audit findings are derived mathematically across 100.00% of the population against legal statutes, civil restitution rules, and authorization bylaws with zero statistical guesswork.
Local Workstation Security & Controlled Retention
Isolated local runtime environment with working datasets securely purged following report transmittal and client confirmation.
Request a Written Proposal
Engage through structured, evidence-based scoping. Specify your organizational parameters below to receive an indicative written proposal, data-readiness specifications, and delivery terms (normally within one business day) under strict bilateral confidentiality. Technical briefings or meetings may be scheduled whenever useful.
4-Step Asynchronous Engagement Architecture
Define entity type, fiscal years, ERP system, and transaction volume via the written parameters below.
AEOS returns an indicative scoping proposal, DOC 01–04 specifications, potential pricing models, and defined engagement terms.
Encrypted network transfer via SFTP/TLS or optional physical offline media. Deterministic execution on dedicated local workstations.
Receipt of sealed restitution dossiers with SHA-256 Merkle roots. Client retains sole enforcement authority with dedicated written follow-up.
Client-Side Written Scoping Request Generator
Select your parameters below to generate an exact written scoping dossier. No data is stored or transmitted until you send your request.